'unmarked' 333 EKII's query

[tinmantis]

Hi guys,
Since one of our members nearly got stung by one of those 333 marked EKIIs, I've been having a closer look at my unmarked EKIIs.
It was mentioned that an 'unmarked' 333 would be hard to recognize. Then I got the jitters about my unmarked ones...

Could I please have your thoughts on these EKs (regardless of the 333 connection)
The last cross is the one that concerns me regarding the 333 fake. Is it an unmarked 333?
regards
jon

[tinmantis]

2

[tinmantis]

3

[tinmantis]

4

[tinmantis]

5

[tinmantis]

this is the one I'm more concerned about (compared to the 333 fake):

[tinmantis]

details:

[Airborne Nut]

Unless my eyes decieve me the "3" in the last cross is different from the known fake. The curl at teh bottom of the "3" right where it comes to a circle, appears to be much larger on your cross, and not have as much of a hook to it as the 333 fake. But the pics are a bit fuzzy so it IS hard to tell.

-Shane

[tinmantis]

maybe this feature (I've just noticed) can clear this up.
The dates are very 'thin' as these following pics show. Is that attributed to any known maker? or the dreaded 333?
regards
jon

[tinmantis]

2

[tinmantis]

3

[tinmantis]

last:

[Frank Heukemes]

I do not think you have to fear anything. Just compare the frames.