Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_af793d13915867bf0f9ee49ec8c71243d65bac36b7b1e63b, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Knight Crosses today - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
Helmut Weitze

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Knight Crosses today

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    RK preliminary award document to Major der Reserve Ernst Schneck
    Kommandeur I. / Grenadier-Regiment 698 / 342.Infanterie-Division
    Presented on: November 16th, 1944

    Schneck also got the CCCiG in 1945.
    Attached Files

    Comment


      RK formal award document to Hauptmann Josef-Otto Riepold
      Chef 5./PzRgt 5
      Presented on: July 29th, 1942
      Attached Files

      Comment


        RK formal award document to Oberstleutnant Josef Salminger
        Kommandeur III. / Gebirgsjäger-Regiment 98 / 1.Gebirgs-Division
        Presented on: August 31st, 1941
        Attached Files

        Comment


          Oak Leaves formal award document to General der Panzergruppen Ludwig Crüwell
          Kommandeur 11.Panzer-Division / Panzergruppe 1
          Presented on: September 1st, 1941

          (Photo credits to "Honoring Those They Led: Decorated Field Commanders of the Third Reich", by authors Mark C. Yerger and Leslie Fiorenza)
          Attached Files

          Comment


            RK preliminary award document to Hauptmann Horst-Günther von Fassong
            Kommandeur, III. Gruppe, Jagdgeschwader 11, Luftwaffe
            Presented on: July 27th, 1944

            (Photo credits to Emedals.com)
            Attached Files
            Last edited by Sepp45; 05-11-2017, 09:25 PM.

            Comment


              Here is another photo, supposedly, of Fassong. The person in the photo from eMedals is an Oberleutnant and Fassong was awarded the RK 2 months after he was promoted to Hauptmann. Wrong photo? Right photo and couldn't get the correct insignia for his uniform?

              12.02.43 Oblt., appt Staka 10./JG 51.
              20.09.43 Oblt., awarded Ehrenpokal.
              17.10.43 Oblt., awarded DKG, 10./JG 51.
              04.44 Oblt., Staka 10./JG 51, appt Staka 7./JG 11 (to 05.44).
              01.05.44 promo to Hptm.
              05.44 appt Kdr. III./JG 11 (to 01.01.45).
              27.07.44 Hptm., awarded Ritterkreuz, Kdr. III./JG 11.
              01.01.45 Hptm. and Kdr. III./JG 11, MIA
              Attached Files

              Comment


                Hi Leroy, thanks for the info and input on the picture. You are correct, it's not Fassong! I will leave the KC doc only and remove the photo

                Comment


                  RK awarded to Generalmajor Johannes Bruhn
                  Artillerie Kommandeur 149
                  Awarded on: December 20th, 1943

                  (Photo credits to team-militaria.de)
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                    Front and back of Johannes Bruhn's KC

                    (Photo credits to team-militaria.de)
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                      A few more photos of Bruhn and his KC urkunde

                      (Photo credits to team-militaria.de)
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                        Hello

                        Am I the only one to find the KC preliminary document strange?

                        Comment


                          Hello Denis!

                          Yes, you are only one.

                          Comment


                            Yes, I feel alone; thanks for replying !!

                            So let's go for the reasons and based on close up views from the original website

                            I have to admit that at first glance, the doc was nice looking and not raising any doubts.

                            - The diploma pattern is the correct one for this period; the one presented here is the very final one used from mid February 44 onwards but has never been used for diploma granted in Dec. 43
                            - HP-A rubber stamp, although close, present radical discrepancies (especially on the 2 stars on each side which are too thin and the P of Personalamt whose the very particular shape has never been encountered so far
                            - Finally, when looking closely at the Burgdorf signature, the B is too long while usual ones are much in a 'water drop' shape; added to that the beginnign of the signature present a draw not frankly made as you would expect to see.

                            Here are the reasons why I feel this document doubtful; too many variances sending back a negative feeling for me.
                            Interested to read other members' input on this doc

                            Denis

                            PS: The "Zweitzschrift" alternative (replacement one, usually duly mentioned at the top) woumd have been a reason to justify the diploma pattern change but Zweitschrift diploma were obviously made several months (when not talking years) after the bestowal date, not 6 days as it is displayed here...

                            Comment


                              Hello Denis!

                              I understand your doubts but i do not see everything so scary.

                              RK EK VB's of Faulhaber, Borck, Hofbauer, Behnke... and many other ,,date neighbors" of Johannes Bruhn let me sleep peacefully.

                              BR
                              D.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by DDD777 View Post
                                Hello Denis!

                                I understand your doubts but i do not see everything so scary.

                                RK EK VB's of Faulhaber, Borck, Hofbauer, Behnke... and many other ,,date neighbors" of Johannes Bruhn let me sleep peacefully.

                                BR
                                D.

                                Hello D

                                Yes, using Behnke's, Borck's, Hofbauer's RK diploma whose signature dates are very close of the Bruhn document is really a good way to highlight signifcant discrepancies (the primary one being the diploma pattern) but I don't want to continue to troll Sepp's nice & so interesting thread.

                                If you or other fellow member wants to take time to discuss it in the Paper forum and in a brand new thread, I will be glad to illustrate my opinion with several examples.

                                KR
                                Denis

                                Comment

                                Users Viewing this Thread

                                Collapse

                                There are currently 8 users online. 0 members and 8 guests.

                                Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                                Working...
                                X