Ek1 swastika doubt

[HAWKER HURRICAN]

Hi!. I wanted to comment on whether you think the original and not a EK1 Floch!.
What worries me is the swastika I've seen a few pages EK1 on very thin and I think comparing it with the others!.
I was looking at examples of EK1 Floch and spoke of detections by the esvastica Floch was fine.
Ben told me that was the original k & q unmarked but the subject of the swastika has me worried ..
Do you think? thanks!

[HAWKER HURRICAN]

[HAWKER HURRICAN]

[HAWKER HURRICAN]

[HAWKER HURRICAN]

Pubbb, please aid the more I look I see more and more questions I have ....

[Darrell]

No Floch here.
Original K&Q.

[Wik]

Looks like an original to me. Of course if I was you, I would take Ben and Darrell's opinion over my own!

[AndyC]

Not a Floch, its a good original here


Andy

[HAWKER HURRICAN]

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE HELP GUYS!.
I thought it was a k & q unmarked But Darrel has said me that Was a k & p.Who is this maker???.
GREETINGS!

[Darrell]

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE HELP GUYS!.
I thought it was a k & q unmarked But Darrel has said me that Was a k & p.Who is this maker???.
GREETINGS!

Q = q not p

[5tefan]

Common 65 Need not to have any doubts

[HAWKER HURRICAN]

thank you very much stefann!!.But the 1939 numbers in my cross are not narrow together...is nornal too?

[Woolgar]

Indeed a nice K&Q

Nick

[5tefan]

thank you very much stefann!!.But the 1939 numbers in my cross are not narrow together...is nornal too?

Yes, on 65 they should not be narrow together ;-)

http://www.ek1-dna.de/65-klein---que...oberstein-.php