Knights Cross L/12

[spitfire-01]

Hi,
These are the photos to match an earlier thread.
I don't think it is good.
No 800 mark on cross
800 mark on loop shows "8" wrong shape
no eleven o'clock break in the"0"
full ribs on it are 29, original appears to be 32
Inside corners of main cross are rounded not sharp.
Both the 1 and the 2 do not appear to be Junkers numbers ( different shape)
"3" is stretched and not in line with the loops of the "9"
Also it is about 5 grams lighter.

WAF experts comments appreciated.

Russell

[spitfire-01]

1.

.

[spitfire-01]

2.

.

[panzer wittman]

I can't match this to a junker RK. Fake IMO. If you can get it for a couple of bucks it'd make a nice generic space filler though.

[Flemming]

Not good in my opinion.

/Flemming

[hkusp40]

-Ger

[Ludwig]

Bad cross!

[AFF96]

Hi Russel,
Here's my "800" L/12 to compare:
Cased Knights Cross L 12 Juncker 012.jpg

Cased Knights Cross L 12 Juncker 014.jpg

[kraut72]

very bad

[IVAN]

Hi,

yes, I agree, very poor details...