RK of the war merit w/swords Review

[realone]

Ok guys I think this an early RK its marked 1 900 and it doesnt have the die flaws like the later issued ones have, need a little help here

Thanks
Greg

[realone]

more pics

[Ludwig]

More and better pictures are needed, IMO.

[realone]

Ok Ludwig,,give me a day ,,I will get some better pics,,time for new cam I guess
Thanks
Greg

[Ludwig]

No hurry, my friend!

[realone]

more pics

[realone]

pics

[Ludwig]

IMO not original!

[Dietrich Maerz]

It has the flaws one would like to see on a genuine Deschler. IMHO an original.

Dietrich

[Jody]

RK des KvK

Hello,
It looks good to me.

Regards,
Jody

[realone]

Thanks guys,,I got this over 20 yrs ago,,from a great source here in calif, always felt it was a good one,,again thanks guys for all your inputs.


Greg

[Ludwig]

It has the flaws one would like to see on a genuine Deschler. IMHO an original.

Dietrich

With YOU I will not argue, my friend!

[Peter J.]

Dietrich, I've got a stupid question. Why was a silver paint added to a cross in pure silver? IMO that presents a much "cheaper" appearance.

cheers
Peter

[Blitzbundeln]

Hi Dietrich,

Can you point out the flaws for me (us)? I am not familiar with these.

Best regards,
Blitz

[Dietrich Maerz]

Dietrich, I've got a stupid question. Why was a silver paint added to a cross in pure silver? IMO that presents a much "cheaper" appearance.

cheers
Peter

That I do not know since I was not sitting next to the piece the last 70 or so years. I don't even know whether it is silver paint as you assume.
All I can say is that the piece has the typical Deschler flaws and based on that (and that alone since I don't have the pievce in hand) I think it is a good piece.

Dietrich