Looking for opinion about EK1 screw back

[magnusmilitaria]

Hello guys!

Im looking for some opinion about this EK1.
I dont think is ok..
Best
M

[streptile]

Hi Mark,

I think it is fine.

[plaut]

Hi Mark,

It's mine EK. Why do you think it not ok? IMO text book l59 SB.

[magnusmilitaria]

Hello Michal!

Thanks for reply. One my friend ask me for opinion on that cross but Im not 100% shure on it. Like cross looks fine but I dont like black colour and MM behind looks strange to me !? Maybe Im total wrong so I decided that is bether to hear some more opinion here on WAF.
Thank You in advance!

Best Regards
Mark

[Woolgar]

A fine example with a typical extra symbol marked on the back

Here is my example:

Nick

[magnusmilitaria]

thanks for present and info Nick!
Best
mark

[Aiceman]

Hi Mark!

I have "x" Rettenmaier too. Here is:

[Douglas 5]

Hi Mark :
I have worked on L/59 crosses for a while now . The L59 mark is not a work of art but a bit on the 'rough' side ... with the 9 sitting a bit low . Mark variations exist . Appears to be of original parts . Core strike looks to be on the shallow side and somewhat glossy paint - ... as this harder to find core type does exist - also found with a different frame and marked L59 . Parts may have been sourced out as it is not their 'usual' one .
I would say a good cross . Same 'soft ' core features as the comparison below on the right shows .

Douglas

[magnusmilitaria]

Hello!

Fantastic presentation my friends and very nice crosses by Rettenmaier.
Thank You one more time for help!
Best Regards
Mark

[ben bijker]

Nice L59 with glossy paint, I have an L59 just like it, but that's a pin back.

best regards,
Ben