I've always had a question regarding some RK's that, from time to time, are being sold at auction sites or by private collectors. The so called "battle-damaged" RK... are what they seem to be or just another way to add more dollars to a grouping or medal?
Some examples:
Source: http://www.ritterkreuz.us/battle-dam...reuz/#more-751
This one "belonged" to KIA officer Karl Eglseer (General der Gebirgstruppe). The RK was found at his crash site, along other items.
Source: https://www.emedals.com/Pages/Direct...s.aspx?id=3743
Or maybe this RK attributed to pilot Rudolf Frank. This peculiar knight Cross was discussed here some time ago, but again: would a dealer go as far as "conditioning" an original RK in order to add more value to his sale?
Or this RK, that has already made "headlines" here on WAF.
What are your thoughts with all of this? For the rookie collector (like me ) if anyone tries to sell us a "battle damaged" RK we woudn't doubt a minute it is the "real deal", but for the trained eye, there is always a second analysis.
Like to know your ideas!
Regards,
Sepp.
Some examples:
Source: http://www.ritterkreuz.us/battle-dam...reuz/#more-751
This one "belonged" to KIA officer Karl Eglseer (General der Gebirgstruppe). The RK was found at his crash site, along other items.
Source: https://www.emedals.com/Pages/Direct...s.aspx?id=3743
Or maybe this RK attributed to pilot Rudolf Frank. This peculiar knight Cross was discussed here some time ago, but again: would a dealer go as far as "conditioning" an original RK in order to add more value to his sale?
Or this RK, that has already made "headlines" here on WAF.
What are your thoughts with all of this? For the rookie collector (like me ) if anyone tries to sell us a "battle damaged" RK we woudn't doubt a minute it is the "real deal", but for the trained eye, there is always a second analysis.
Like to know your ideas!
Regards,
Sepp.
Comment