Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_91fb2c843eb591fe05275602a132d4b5d99398171149a130, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 EK2 mm4: real or fake? - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
SandeBoetik

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EK2 mm4: real or fake?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    EK2 mm4: real or fake?

    hello guys,
    hereis another cross about which I've a lot of doubts. It's marked "4" but its measurements are not matching the known ones: 43,74 x 43,84 mm and 19,92 gr.
    What do you think about?
    Thanks in advance
    Val



    Tags: None
    #2
    Real but not 4.

    Comment

      #3
      Originally posted by fabri-online View Post
      Real but not 4.
      a 3 with a fake 4 stamp.
      Best regards,
      Streptile

      Looking for ROUND BUTTON 1939 EK1 Spange cases (LDO or PKZ)

      Comment

        #4
        What is with all the fake, wrong or tampered with, MMs lately?! Very sad as both S&L and Deumer can be very nice crosses, marked or unmarked.

        Ryan

        Comment

          #5
          Is that really a fake 4 stamp ?

          Comment

            #6
            Originally posted by jack1 View Post
            Is that really a fake 4 stamp ?
            Actually no; we were all wrong years ago and the cross is fine.
            Best regards,
            Streptile

            Looking for ROUND BUTTON 1939 EK1 Spange cases (LDO or PKZ)

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by streptile View Post
              Actually no; we were all wrong years ago and the cross is fine.
              I agree. Tom

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by streptile View Post
                Actually no; we were all wrong years ago and the cross is fine.
                And the thread was forgotten about and left the person very sad but actually he had a real cross 4.

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by jack1 View Post
                  And the thread was forgotten about and left the person very sad but actually he had a real cross 4.
                  Yes, I forgot this thread but fortunately I came in the opinion that the cross was a good one by myself.
                  Anyway thanks a lot for your opinions.
                  Val

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Do you still have the cross ?
                    If so could you show some better pictures please.

                    Comment

                      #11
                      Originally posted by jack1 View Post
                      Do you still have the cross ?
                      If so could you show some better pictures please.
                      Not sorry, I've sold it from a long time.

                      Comment

                        #12
                        A post I missed back then ..... - a good S&L and mark .

                        Douglas

                        Comment

                          #13
                          Fantastic result to the thread.

                          Comment

                          Previous template Next

                          Users Viewing this Thread

                          Collapse

                          There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                          Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                          Working...
                          X