EK 2 Opinions Please

[Craig H]

All opinions appreciated .

[Craig H]

2

[Craig H]

3

[Craig H]

4

[Craig H]

Nobody has an opinion ? Real/fake , possible maker ? Heres a few more pic's.

[Craig H]

5

[Craig H]

6

[George Stimson]

Maybe I can get to my database and have a look (I"m traveling and don't have my crosses with me.).
I think that the "noses" on the "1" s of "1813" are distinct. Does that ring a bell with anyone?

[streptile]

Hi George,

This one didn't ring any bells for me without consulting my photos.

[Dietrich Maerz]

I don't know either.

Dietrich

[Wik]

I never thought I would see those 3 answers, from those 3 men!

This is like Mace Windu, Yoda and Obi Wan Kenobi, all getting owned at once!







P.S. I have no clue either, but everyone knew that, in this case

[EK-collector]

hahahahaha and what is better maybe you have some rare variant of EK,

PS: I always Like when my threads are from time to time commented by this third persons

[streptile]

Does anyone have good pics of a 106 to post for comparison?

[Danny70]

Does anyone have good pics of a 106 to post for comparison?

Here's my 106 - sadly, it's not a match.
I have no idea at the moment as to the maker (of the initial cross).... but I'm very interested to find out!

Regards - Danny

[Woolgar]

Here is my marked 106 just to confirm