opinions please ...
-
-
next one
-
can you post a picture straight on of the cross and closer of the date???
VanComment
-
sorry, just provided what I had.
today, took a new frontal view. hope it helps.
Comment
-
the date
Comment
-
I don't like this one, sorry. It resembles a known copy ...Comment
-
Sorry, Pep. Almost everything about the DK is different from known and accepted originals.
Have you posted pictures of the uniform? Was it declared "bad" as well?
EricComment
-
IMO not good!Comment
-
I certainly agree with the previous posts.
This cross is not original, in my opinion.-Calvin Hall, repressed Appalachian American.
Desperately seeking a Juncker Knights Cross ribbon loop and well used Knights Cross ribbon!!!Comment
-
Nope not for my collection
AndyComment
-
cloth DKIG
I agree with the others. It is not constructed like known originals. I was burned by the same type of fake when I first started to collect, and was not a member on the WAF. Smitty
Comment
-
that's what I thought!!
the tunic is a good one but re-built with, as exposed, no good insignia.
will return to seller.
Comment
Comment