Fake Knight's Cross ?

[Flemming]

I will go for number 4

I would say number 4 as well because the swaz looks a little round on the top. But I am no expert on this field.


The rim on number 4 dosn´t look as sharp as the others.

Thats my thoughts

Regards Flemming

[tinmantis]

Well,
I take back what I originally said, and after closer looking, I think:

2, Juncker
3, Juncker
4, S+L
5, S+L

and number 1 has maybe an S+L frame, and a different core?

looking forward to seing how wrong I am!
regards
Jon

[Dave Kane]

Good work lads and thanks for the participation....some good observations!!


I'll post now in the same order showing the 'answer'....

Dave

[Dave Kane]

Number 1

Lazy 2 by Juncker!

[Dave Kane]

Number 2!

L/12 Juncker

[Dave Kane]

Number 3!

Another Lazy 2 Juncker

[Dave Kane]

Number """" 4 """""

Yeah pretty bad!!!

[Dave Kane]

Finally number 5

800 S&l

[Biro]

Dave

GIVE ME THAT 1ST LAZY 2.

NOW!!

Man, that is a piece of work. If it's yours, congratulations.

Oh - and good thread too...

[Dave Kane]

Biro, simply put...NO!


It has taken me about 40 yrs to get this one...

However, #4 IS available!


DK

[tinmantis]

ëntis]
2, Juncker
3, Juncker
4, S+L
5, S+L
and number 1 has maybe an S+L frame, and a different core?
[/QUOTE]

Hey, I didn't do too bad! 3/5...
I just couldn't believe No1 was legit, just too nice!
and No4 was a bit blurry to make judgements...

regards
jon