opinion on RK

[François SAEZ]

A friend of mine has the possibility to get this RK
I gave him my opinion but also told him I will ask on the forum for more opinions than mine, but let me say that they are trying harder !!!!

1

[François SAEZ]

2

[François SAEZ]

3

[François SAEZ]

4

[François SAEZ]

5

[François SAEZ]

6

[François SAEZ]

7th and last

[Peter Wiking]

Not good in my opinion. A Juncker and a rounder in one cross ?

Sorry.
Peter Wiking

[François SAEZ]

No need to feel sorry Peter, this RK is far from being bought by my friend, but several opinions will help him to make his own judgement.

Thanks

[Adrian Stevenson]

I would agree with Peter.

I still count myself as a novice when it comes to RK's and even I can see the problems with this one

Cheers, Ade.

[Brian S]

These give Rounders a bad name.

[Rich G]

110% reproduction. Check out the reverse centre... the spacing between the frames at the core centre do not even match.

Listen to François... do not buy this rubbish (unless it's only €20)

Rich

[Gerd W.]

Hi!

Here it is as "Detlev´s fake of the week"!

Regards

Gerd

[Frank Heukemes]

Dear Francois,

It is also interesting to see that the black paint is cracked because the COLOUR cracked (as a wanted "ageing" effect) and not because corrosion underneath the colour built "veins" as we can see on original crosses.

[Dave Kane]

This 'type' of fake

was discussed a while ago and I'd like to point out once again what I suggested then!

Obviously, the fakers are 'listening and learning' and attempting to place all of the attributes of (original) crosses in to their fake productions. This is evidenced by the cross hatching and another subtle feature of (Juncker) we see on this cross.

Lucky for us however they are not SO smart and tend to MIX the points we look for in the various originals in to their fakes.

Dave