David Hiorth

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1914 Deumer EK2 with mm "3"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    1914 Deumer EK2 with mm "3"

    Hi,

    here is a cross I obtained few months ago (the last crosses I bought).
    A common 1914 EK2 (bottom one) but numbered "3".
    I ever thought the PKZ numbered where for attributed orders but how a 1914 cross can have been attributed after 1939 ?

    A Deumer mistake ?

    Michael
    Attached Files
    Last edited by wvdparis2; 10-30-2010, 11:04 AM.

    #2
    Originally posted by wvdparis2 View Post
    Hi,

    here is a cross I obtained few months ago (the last crosses I bought).
    A common 1914 EK2 (bottom one) but numbered "3".
    I ever thought the PKZ numbered where for attibutes orders but how a 1914 cross can have been attibuted after 1939 ?

    A Deumer mistake ?

    Michael
    Very nice cross. There were replacement 1914 crosses made during the 3rd reich era, so I don't think it was a mistake and would love to have this cross myself
    Nice score.
    Dave

    Comment


      #3
      i may have access to another WW1 '3' Michael, it may not be alone, i also have a WW1 BH Mayer EK1 marked 26 considered a mistake (if it was an awarded piece it would be 3 it should be L/11 if it was replacement/private purchased, argument being how can it be awarded in WW2)

      Comment


        #4
        Thnks for answers
        I know an other "3" too but it is very strange
        (for information the right one is a L/11 replacement 1914 EK2)

        Michael

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by evilmike View Post
          i may have access to another WW1 '3' Michael, it may not be alone, i also have a WW1 BH Mayer EK1 marked 26 considered a mistake (if it was an awarded piece it would be 3 it should be L/11 if it was replacement/private purchased, argument being how can it be awarded in WW2)
          O.K. I understand the question. In the early years of the war didn't they mark all their awards with the PKZ number, private and awarded or was the L/ prefix enlisted at the same time? I'm not really sure on regulation specifics, but I do know that a lot of regulations were not always adhered to case in point " brass cored EK's.
          Thanks for the interesting subject and look forward to learning something here.

          Dave

          Comment


            #6
            I think it 's not a mistake, there are several examples from other makers too. just there were not L/11 rings available.
            personally I have a 1914 cored EKII Deschler with the 1 stamp on ring and I have seen another one, looks they didn't use the L/10 stamp.

            Comment

            Users Viewing this Thread

            Collapse

            There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

            Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

            Working...
            X