DKIG, RK and Oaks

[Stu W]

Hi Guys,

I'm of the opinion that the DKIG and RK are good. Not sure how to classify the Oaks. It's 800 stamped which leads me to believe that it might be a private purchase 2nd set as opposed to being the award set. All three pieces came together.

Your thoughts would be appreciated.

Regards,
Stu

[Stu W]

.

[Stu W]

..

[Stu W]

,

[Stu W]

,,

[Stu W]

.,

[Flemming]

I do not think that the EK and OL are original pre May 1945 manufactured.

They seems wrong. But wait for the more experienced on this field.

/Flemming

[kraut72]

Oak not good!Lazy 2 and Zimmi very nice

[Jon. H]

I don't know about the oaks or the KC. But the DKIG is a lovely zimmermann!

[samsung]

The KC is a good one.

Thomas

[Alex Bolotnikov]

From these pics KC looks fine. But I don't feel comfortable with this DKiG... There are TOO MANY Zimmermann's crosses for sale. And all of them are mint and with mint boxes. Just my five copecks...

[Dietrich Maerz]

Only the oaks are bad.

[Stu W]

Hi Guys,

Thanks to each of you for your prompt replies.

Kind regards,
Stu

[Steinar]

Nice DKIG and KC.
From the same soldier?

[juoneen]

I don't like the oaks, but like the rest also. Was there a story on the stuff, or were they just something someone had? Just curious.