Announcement

**sam steele** · 08-14-2010, 10:18 AM

.......and here are close-ups of the Swaz and the date. My attention is drawn to the "1" and "9". A flaw, perhaps?

Cheers,

Bill

Attached Files

**Robert P.** · 08-14-2010, 10:19 AM

Yes, it is a full Juncker with typical flaw.

Robert

**George Stimson** · 08-14-2010, 10:24 AM

'I always had a weak spot for a Juncker, but is it worth $950?"

Only if somebody is willing to buy it for that.

**sam steele** · 08-14-2010, 10:24 AM

Bye the bye......it is unmarked.

Cheers,

Bill

Attached Files

**Robert P.** · 08-14-2010, 10:27 AM

Yes, Bill, it is unmarked. It's an early cross, produced before the regulation to mark crosses was enforced.

Robert

**sam steele** · 08-14-2010, 10:27 AM

Thanks, George.

Ahhhhhhh....................Dealing with a dealer.

Cheers,

Bill

**sam steele** · 08-14-2010, 10:29 AM

Thanks, Robert. So it's been plunked into a later LDO case, then.

Cheers,

Bill

**Robert P.** · 08-14-2010, 10:31 AM

I believe so, Bill.

Robert

**sam steele** · 08-14-2010, 10:32 AM

.................Not as bad as a Knights Cross case with carton for over $7600?

I remember cases going for around $2000 not too long ago.

Thanks again,

Bill

**Douglas 5** · 08-14-2010, 10:42 AM

Yes a relative early Juncker EK2 , Bill .
Pricy indeed .

Douglas

Is this a Juncker EK II?