Some EK 2:s,opinions?

[jaska.h]

Hello!
Since I´m obviously not an expert(in badges anyway...or anything else for that matter...)I´m posting some of my EK 2 here.Cross nr.4,mfg stamping 85 I am not sure about,looks "too good"?They are all magnetisch,mfg stamped but that doesn´t tell much.
So, stampings from left to right:
mfg stamping 55
mfg stamping 107
mfg stamping 40
mfg stamping 85
mfg stamping 11



EK 2,55




EK 2,107




EK 2,40




EK 2,85




EK 2,11





Best Regards,
Jaska
UpNorth

[grueni1208]

No. 4: Stuttgart fake
No. 3: IMO maker 55, too

Regards

Daniel

[Adrian]

Can you post a photo of the '107' and it's makers mark please?

[streptile]

Really, they are difficult to judge from these photos. We need straight shots, like this:



... and shots of the marks.

[jaska.h]

New(hopefully better)photos...

Hello!
It´s not that easy,old camera,unexperienced photographer etc...

55:




107:




40:




85:




11:




If photos from the reverse side is needed,I´ll post more tomorrow.

From UpNorth,
Jaska

[grueni1208]

I believe you got some EK II's with postwar stamps

Regards

Daniel

[jaska.h]

Opinions,anyone else?
Thanks,
Jaska
UpNorth

[gasschutzgerate]

I believe you got some EK II's with postwar stamps

Regards

Daniel

hello
which one ?

regards
Roland

[grueni1208]

The EK II with "40" stamp is to 100% a "55".
I never saw an "107" EK II and I don't know anything about EK II packets by Carl Wild, therefore I belive CW doesn't produced EK II's.

Regards

Daniel

[jaska.h]

Hello!
It has been a while and I thank You for your comments.Does anyone have any opinions on the mm85 and mm11?The mm85 measures about 44.7-44.8mm and it does rattle.The ring has a diameter of 12.7-12.8mm,quite small.The cross and ring has a very matte frosting.The mm11 measures about 44.3-44.4mm,the ring is 14.7-14.8.The core does not rattle.Photos of the makers marks I have posted before in this same thread,and here is a few more pics on these two crosses mentioned.I would be thankful for any comments on these.They both look kind of "too new"...
Best Regards from UpNorth,
Jaska

mm85:






mm11:

[blutundehre]

The cross marked 85 is a fake, as previously stated. The corner beading is trying to be a Souval, but the bead is missing the flaws of a Souval as well as the inner bead around the swaz is not rounded quite like a war-time Souval.
I'm not sure if Souval made these after the war, but they are, IMO, post-war.
Dave

[Adrian]

The '11' looks good to me.

[jaska.h]

Thanks for Your answers guys.The mm11 is actually better than it is in the pics.It has some frosting left on frame,and it is in very good,allmost new-like overall condition.That´s why I suspected it could also be a toy.
Best Regards,
Jaska
UpNorth

[fabri-online]

Hello
the "85" is fake as just sayd, no chance to be original, but the "11" is a good one.