I agree with what Dez just said. For myself I choose not to have a piece in my collection that I have "to defend". For some collectors the maker's mark immediately casts a bad light on this cross while for others it would not matter, with the most likely reason being a lack of knowledge. All of us has our own level of experience and knowledge, I like EK's but I don't have a deep interest in them, until I read Dietrich's comment I wasn't aware that Bauer wasn't a known maker of EK's. If I was considering buying this cross I would do the same as any other purchase, investigate the piece, find out what a good one should have etc. etc. Other guys may just look at it see a cross with a "maker's mark" and assume it's good. Everyone has their own criteria for what items they would own and I believe it's based on their level of knowledge.
That being said, for me the mark on this cross lessens the value and although we do have price ranges for different awards the bottom line in determing value is what is someone willing to pay. When John first posted this he did so with the best intentions
"....I was hoping I could get some opinions on this 1939 EK1. I am considering offering it in a trade and I want to be 100% about it......."
If I were in John's position I'd explain to the other party what has been said about the cross and then try to arrive at a value that was agreeable to both parties.
That being said, for me the mark on this cross lessens the value and although we do have price ranges for different awards the bottom line in determing value is what is someone willing to pay. When John first posted this he did so with the best intentions
"....I was hoping I could get some opinions on this 1939 EK1. I am considering offering it in a trade and I want to be 100% about it......."
If I were in John's position I'd explain to the other party what has been said about the cross and then try to arrive at a value that was agreeable to both parties.
Comment