Dear fellow collectors.
I think I have to actualize the traces after flaws on Steinhauer&Lück KCs.
As far as I have understood, Detlev Niemann and Kai Winkler have a very good reputation here. I can understand that, because they both are very experienced and often have very rare and nice items for sale.
Detlev Niemann has sold KCs with flaw-traces and Kai Winkler has one now for sale (#6839).
So are they fooling us or do they not know what´s real and what´s not?
Personally I think small traces of flaws are OK. I have seen crosses still in the hands of the original holder with these traces and they (the traces of flaws) are of the same pattern as on the Niemann- and Winkler- crosses. I can´t see why the KC holder should lie about were and when he got his cross...
I think I have to actualize the traces after flaws on Steinhauer&Lück KCs.
As far as I have understood, Detlev Niemann and Kai Winkler have a very good reputation here. I can understand that, because they both are very experienced and often have very rare and nice items for sale.
Detlev Niemann has sold KCs with flaw-traces and Kai Winkler has one now for sale (#6839).
So are they fooling us or do they not know what´s real and what´s not?
Personally I think small traces of flaws are OK. I have seen crosses still in the hands of the original holder with these traces and they (the traces of flaws) are of the same pattern as on the Niemann- and Winkler- crosses. I can´t see why the KC holder should lie about were and when he got his cross...
Comment