Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_f49c1efd772dffa0c853e41f6d50886bc7097544f12fa56d, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 S&L A Type RK with flaw - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
Vintage Productions

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

S&L A Type RK with flaw

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    S&L A Type RK with flaw

    Whilst not wishing to resurrect the whole debate on this matter, has anyone any idea as to a time period as to the issuance of these flawed pieces:
    1941,42 ,43....or 44 on. I know this is highly contentious nonetheless any ideas would be welcome.
    Thanks Kyle
    Tags: None
    #2
    Hello

    Is there anyone there ???????

    Comment

      #3
      It really depends on the amount of flaws. As far as I can tell by the collected data, the heavily flawed were issued around mid-end of 1944. I can't say when the first showed up, but I know that the award piece of Hartmann (Oct. 43) has no flaws. However, so many factors between manufacturing and distribution play into it that it might not be possible to establish a decent time line.
      B&D PUBLISHING
      Premium Books from Collectors for Collectors

      Comment

        #4
        Originally posted by Dietrich Maerz View Post
        However, so many factors between manufacturing and distribution play into it that it might not be possible to establish a decent time line.
        And crosses with a similar amount of flaws were allegedly awarded in 1943 and 1945.

        Robert
        Attached Files

        Comment

          #5
          RK Flawed

          Thanks gentlemen real useful input and much appreciated.

          Comment

            #6
            Thanks Robert/Dietrich

            What is interesting the cross I am considering has a very minor flaw, 3 o 'clock arm, up top ,nothing else, and no flaws on the reverse, issue date March 1943. I have no doubt about the credibility of the seller.There are accompanying photos which only tell me this debate wil continue.
            Thanks gents Kyle

            Comment

            Previous template Next

            Users Viewing this Thread

            Collapse

            There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.

            Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

            Working...
            X