Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_e76c30769daf83c0c90e8c83f53ae2d6dd5aacb5583596b3, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Question about S&L RK, A/B pieces. - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
Helmut Weitze

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question about S&L RK, A/B pieces.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Question about S&L RK, A/B pieces.

    I gor a stupid question, but im sure that you also answer them

    What is the dirrerence between S&L A / B pieces???
    Some say that the B pieces are NOT warpieces and others say the ARE war pieces.

    What can I believe?? just the short version.

    Regards Thomas.
    Best regards Thomas.


    WWW.CROWMOOR.DK

    #2
    hi.

    the shortest answer....

    http://www.ironcross1939.com/Ritterkreuz-1.htm

    get this book of dietrich

    or ( if you can login or able to translate )


    http://sammlergemeinschaft-deutscher...php?threadid=4


    greetings
    B.

    Comment


      #3
      re

      a types has their signs , explained in the book and are definitive wartime crosses .

      b-types have nearly the same frame but their special signs,

      ( http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...&highlight=935 )

      but only the b-types stamped with "800 4" and the 935 4 " are possibly wartime crosses ...all other are postwar...

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Basusu1166 View Post
        a types has their signs , explained in the book and are definitive wartime crosses .

        b-types have nearly the same frame but their special signs,

        ( http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...&highlight=935 )

        but only the b-types stamped with "800 4" and the 935 4 " are possibly wartime crosses ...all other are postwar...


        It appears that research is ongoing to remove the "possible" designation........Happy Thanksgiving Jimmy

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Basusu1166 View Post

          but only the b-types stamped with "800 4" and the 935 4 " are possibly wartime crosses ...all other are postwar...
          I would say, based on Klessheim and OTHER believable reports and physical findings, as well, that both the 800-4 and 935-4 are certainly wartime. I would not exclude the POSSIBILITY of some other "B" crosses being wartime, too, although at this point we can't positively say this with confidence. Certainly, in my opinion, the first postwar assembled "B" crosses were assembled using wartime leftover original stock. As time progressed, changes appear in both frames and cores which point to S&L having run out of original stock and, in response, beginning new stamping. The very first 1957 models used, I am personally convinced, leftover frames (w/o raised beading flaws).

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Leroy View Post
            I would say, based on Klessheim and OTHER believable reports and physical findings, as well, that both the 800-4 and 935-4 are certainly wartime. I would not exclude the POSSIBILITY of some other "B" crosses being wartime, too, although at this point we can't positively say this with confidence. Certainly, in my opinion, the first postwar assembled "B" crosses were assembled using wartime leftover original stock. As time progressed, changes appear in both frames and cores which point to S&L having run out of original stock and, in response, beginning new stamping. The very first 1957 models used, I am personally convinced, leftover frames (w/o raised beading flaws).
            How do the micro 800 cross fit into this?????
            Best regards Thomas.


            WWW.CROWMOOR.DK

            Comment


              #7
              The "micro 800" stamp was used on type "A" S&L crosses at approximately the same time (and perhaps contemporaneously with) the standard size "800" stamp, although some believe the "micro" is actually a bit earlier. There are also "B" crosses with a "micro 800" stamp (although, to be honest, I have not compared the marks to see if the actual same tool was used). I seriously doubt that there was a shortage of silver content stamps!

              P.S. To add to the confusion, some "B" crosses have real silver frames and some have neusilber frames. Some of the ones with real silver frames are not marked for silver content (although, by law, they should have been). Who knows why? Carelessness, a mix-up in frames so the employee didn't know what they were and so applied no stamp out of caution, etc.? Again, no one except the people who were directly involved would know for sure.
              Last edited by Leroy; 11-24-2009, 01:40 PM.

              Comment


                #8
                I thought it went :
                1. A Type 800
                2. A type micro 800
                3. 935/4 and or 800/4 (magnetic)
                4. Huge grey area here
                5. Post war Types

                Rich
                Interested in hand-stitched EM/NCO LW insignia and cuff-titles
                Decorations of Germany

                Comment


                  #9
                  I believe Dietrich thinks (and he can speak for himself) that both styles of
                  "800" were used at the same time.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    The award dates of 800 and micro 800 are intermingled. There is no transition visible like one has with the 800 and L/12 and 2.
                    B&D PUBLISHING
                    Premium Books from Collectors for Collectors

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Dietrich,
                      May I ask what would be the approximately award dates be for the 800 and the micro 800.

                      Many thanks, Gareth

                      Comment

                      Users Viewing this Thread

                      Collapse

                      There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                      Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                      Working...
                      X