Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_b2ec1b042ed05664f4a04aa5e55c749487beee4ce0059609, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 IC 1st. Maker? - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
FlandersMilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IC 1st. Maker?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Here's the reverse of mine.

    George

    Comment


      #17
      Possibly because the 'frame' was turned around prior to soldering??Dave
      Regards,
      Dave

      Comment


        #18
        Seems to be the same hinge as Dave's.
        B&D PUBLISHING
        Premium Books from Collectors for Collectors

        Comment


          #19
          9 o'clock arm. No flaws either.
          Attached Files
          Last edited by Dietrich; 01-06-2004, 10:00 PM.
          B&D PUBLISHING
          Premium Books from Collectors for Collectors

          Comment


            #20
            "Seems to be the same hinge as Dave's."
            It is. (No flaws on mine.)
            George

            Comment


              #21
              Hi Dave

              My guess would also be K&Q. Two other points you might want to check.
              K&Q used at least two different centers, but both have a slightly domed
              swastika. That is slightly higher at the center. Also the hindge thru pin is
              normally neatly domed on both ends. Much like the head of a metal screw.
              It would seem K&Q also used two types of pins. What I believe to be an earlier
              type is somewhat flat. Like yours. The later more common type is slightly
              rounded off to the sides. Maker # stampings also varied. I once had an
              unmarked one similar to yours. It did however have all the K&Q traits.
              Possibly one made early on under a big contract.

              Hope this is of some help to you.

              Best regards
              Ken

              Comment


                #22
                Here's the follow-up to last night!!

                Curiosity prompted me to try and find out the maker of the cross...turns out to be K&Q!
                What is a bit confusing to me however, is that it is unmarked (early?) yet has a severe flaw (in this case) in the 9oc arm!

                The frame seems identical to those shown sporting the '65' mark!

                There is no question as to the cross' pedigree as I know where, when and by whom etc.

                Any thoughts at all?

                Dave
                Attached Files
                Last edited by Dave Kane; 01-07-2004, 08:00 PM.
                Regards,
                Dave

                Comment


                  #23
                  1
                  Attached Files
                  Regards,
                  Dave

                  Comment


                    #24
                    2
                    Attached Files
                    Regards,
                    Dave

                    Comment


                      #25
                      3
                      Attached Files
                      Regards,
                      Dave

                      Comment


                        #26
                        4
                        Regards,
                        Dave

                        Comment


                          #27
                          5
                          Regards,
                          Dave

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Well, I'll say what I've said before: I'm not certain that all of these marks we see on EK (and RK) rims can be attributed to "die flaws."
                            George

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Dave,


                              you can judge that better since you have the actual piece in hand, but could this be a physical damage? It looks like somebody was putting the cross in a vise or similiar and the beading was pressed flat. How dooes it look from the side?

                              Dietrich
                              B&D PUBLISHING
                              Premium Books from Collectors for Collectors

                              Comment


                                #30
                                George I understand!

                                Dietrich, from the side it surely is a 'flaw'...raised above the ridges and starting below and between them. This is not debris that was pressed onto the frame but is integral to it.

                                Dave
                                Regards,
                                Dave

                                Comment

                                Users Viewing this Thread

                                Collapse

                                There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.

                                Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                                Working...
                                X