Oh no.....that Floch again..

[ApathyL]

Just thought to bring it to your attention...

http://www.svmilitaria.com/images/20842b.JPG

Cheers, Les.





.

[Robert P.]

Yes, you are correct, a Floch.

[hlynur76]

"This is a very solid example. The front shows hones age and use. The back has a nice even patina. The pin and catch are both very solid. The case is the nicer domed style. Overall, it is a very solid honest example."

[juoneen]

Wheres the back shot? All i see at the link is the front...did i miss something? Man this one could have fooled me as that front shot looks aged and salty.

[Jamz]

I see a couple little x'es on the left, top and bottom inner beading corners by the swaz.
I see the low date with the last 9 thicker than the first. John

[ApathyL]

The case is good, but the cross is poo

[ApathyL]

Wheres the back shot?

http://www.svmilitaria.com/images/20842c.JPG

http://www.svmilitaria.com/images/20842zz.JPG

http://www.svmilitaria.com/images/20842a.JPG

[ApathyL]

....and again LoL


http://www.brentsantiques.com/cgi-bi...y_Item.asp?733

[hlynur76]

Wheres the back shot? All i see at the link is the front...did i miss something? Man this one could have fooled me as that front shot looks aged and salty.

The 1939 number on these Floch´s is a give away from know exambles.

[juoneen]

Thanks I gotcha now ...that pin is really telling, along with the other details previously mentioned.. I wonder if anyone ever replaced an original crosses pin that was missing with a floch pin? If so then would you say they floched themselves up??