Ek i "65"

[HuD]

Hello everyone,
yesterday i posted a couple of pictures of an EK II from Klein & Quenzer and tonight i have some picture of the EK I from the same maker.
To be honest there are some little details that make me think.. there is a deep scratch on the bottom arm of the swasi, some bubbles between the numbers and finally some dirt on the edges on the rear part. Hope the pictures help to see what i am trying to say...
I really need your opinion on this, is this a right one?
Many thanks,
Stefano

[HuD]

the reverse with wow 65 marking

[dengwill]

It wasn't very well filed

[Robert P.]

Everything about this cross looks fine. Yet, it is unusual to see the unfiled reverse edges. But that's of no concern regarding originality.

[LuckyLuudje]

I can't see anything wrong about it.
But if possible, post a picture of the side where it is filed.

[HuD]

Ek i "65"

Thanks Robert, you just enlightened me
i am uploading a couple of pictures that point out some little imperfection on the core and reverse. In general it seems to be quite rough outlined, don't you think?
Stefano

[HuD]

opened reverse

[HuD]

I really tried Luud but i guess i am missing the right photo equipment... anyway a couple of picture of the filed edges (both sides).
stefano

[HuD]

the other side

[Robert P.]

That's quite a flaw on the last '9'. It appears the firm missed finishing the reverse edges.

[Adrian]

It may not be a perfect shiny example but it is original.

[LuckyLuudje]

I still can't see any red flags

[darkman666]

An Original Klein & Quenzer. Looks good to me.

[tinmantis]

you think YOU've got problems!
regards
jon