Looking to purchase these, not to sure if they are good or not? These are the only photos I have from the owner. I hope they are good Iron crosses!! Thank you for your time.
Sal
Sal
-
-
2. -
3.Comment
-
4.Comment
-
First cross seems to be fake, from what i can see based on the pin.
The 2nd cross is a 27Comment
-
Agree with Steinar, 1st bad, 2nd good.
best
HankUnless it was nighttime, or the weather was bad, and you were running out of gas - then it was a sweaty nightmare, like a monkey f*ing a skunk.
~ Dan Hampton, Viper PilotComment
-
I agree with Steinar and Hank, the first one is a fake.Comment
-
As the other guys have said, the first is a crude fake trying to be a schinkel but the second is a good, original example of an EK2.Comment
-
Besides the poor looking pin on the EKI, Have a look at the 1939 date and the difference in the two 9's! Pi$$ poor core date! Run Away!!!!!
KevinComment
-
Agreed. And the maker mark "20" doesn't look right. But the EK2 is a good original.Comment
-
Don't forget the poor attempt at a maker's mark.Comment
-
I'll pass on the Ek1. Thanks for all your help. I see what your saying about the casting and clasp.
Regards,
SalComment
Comment