schinkel ek1 opinions please

[cobra-2001]

hi i found this one and need input . it is marked L/15 and is one piece const. it is dimped on the black area. not sure about the round conners on the inside is right for a L/15 early one .CAN ANYONE HELP.

[cobra-2001]

Pic 2

Pic 2

[Adrian]

Save your money!

[Nigel N]

i dont like the corners either, the finish doesnt look right, and i dont think schinkels are usually marked!!

[grueni1208]

1. no schinkel design
2. fake

Regards

Daniel

[jt327gir]

A very bad fake.

[Steinar]

what a horrible monster... whats up with the extremely round corners

[Joao Alberto]

Bad fake indeed.

J.

[redjames2004]

Ugly Ek1!!!!!!

Ugliest fake Schinkel EK1 I ever saw!!!!! Please save your money!!!! I once owned a Schinkel EK2 that turned to be a excellent fake. I keep this EK as my lesson hard way. Dont buy this ugly EK1!!! Thanks!

[tomlaan]

Very bad!!!!

[5tefan]

the mm tell you everythink !

[Douglas 5]

A good fishing weight .

[ben bijker]

In fact it is a " normal" ek, not a schinkel.
That is caused by the pic.

There are some people that believe these crosses are authentic, but I'm not one of them...

Best regards,
Ben

[Paratrooper]

In fact it is a " normal" ek, not a schinkel.
That is caused by the pic.

There are some people that believe these crosses are authentic, but I'm not one of them...

Best regards,
Ben

Hi,

i agree with Ben. Some old collectors told me that this is one of the first FLOCH fakes in the late 70th.
The reverse Setup looks like the B-Typ Setup by Floch.

Here is an example.
The data:

• One piece marked L15 magnetic
• High: 44,92
• Widh: 45,11 mm
• Weight: 21,9 g