another RK opionions anybody?

[juoneen]

[juoneen]

[juoneen]

I was told it didnt match to any repros or originals presently known. I have no idea either. keep posting any and all opinions.

[juoneen]

more

[juoneen]

r arm

[juoneen]

same different vantage

[juoneen]

ring inside

[juoneen]

swords handle seam close up

[juoneen]

wear on corner

[juoneen]

The silence is deafening...

[Ludwig]

Not original!

[don-zamo]

Yes, ludwig, i agree. sorry mate.

james m

[jt327gir]

bad.

[all1knew]

Hello there,

The maker mark should have given it away....

William Kramer

[juoneen]

What if the makers mark was placed on this for another maker who didnt make them, and just ordered it from another manufacturer, maybe to fill an order request. could the 5 mark have been placed there made by one manufacturer with the code of another one to pass the pkz for possible approval, or put on an original cross post war by some idiot , to attempt to make it more valueable?
Just a theory, anybody think thats a possible senario?
What if another 5 marked RK showed up somewhere in the future with provenance? Hasnt it been stated somewhere that there may someday be some other manufacturers yet not seen come out of the hiding possibly in the future On RK's, and be added to the list if vet found?
Hey im just throwing out theorys ...thats all, i think id like to entertain all the possibilities , so..could any of these theorys be possible ? Not that thats the case , but i just wanted to add that to the mix to play the devils advocate card. ....anyone ??