ek 2 inentification

[Montgomery Burns]

is it a juncker !?


upiniuns please

,,

[Montgomery Burns]

,,,

[don-zamo]

hey Kay, I say 100, but Im probably wrong

James M

[grueni1208]

100% Juncker

crosshatching version

Regards

Grueni

[don-zamo]

hey Kay, I say 100, but Im probably wrong

James M

Looks like I was wrong Nice cross though Kay

James M

[Robert P.]

Kay,

Grueni's right, a nice early Juncker EKII. It looks like it has the hand-applied frosting on the beading, making it a very early coin silver frame and early core. I can see where some of the frosting on the reverse beading has been wiped down on the bead step. A beauty. These earlier crosses are hard to find. Congratulations. I can tell by looking at the obverse photo that the core is slightly convex.

Robert

[Friedrich]

Nice cross! Is the core unmagnetic? Does the frame have the supposed three die-flaws? I'm trying to learn the traits.. Maybe you haven't even got it in your hands yet..

[Montgomery Burns]

Nice cross! Is the core unmagnetic? Does the frame have the supposed three die-flaws? I'm trying to learn the traits.. Maybe you haven't even got it in your hands yet..

its mine alwright,,here at my home ,,,

wel godet ek's are nice,,,this juncker is the second ek maker i like very much

and these flaws i do know nothing about ,,,
aim looking at the general features..

and i think i did wel on this one

thank jou all fore joure nice replaie's

regards kay

[Robert P.]

Hello Kay,

Here are the (3) flaws Friedrich was referring to on these Juncker frames...

Robert

The first...

[Robert P.]

the second...

[Robert P.]

the third...

[Montgomery Burns]

jip all 3 off them

,,