134 Klein DKiG Copy on Detlev's update

[Robert P.]

Hi fellas,

Did everyone see the superb Klein DK copy Detlev posted on his update this morning? I can see nothing but trouble ahead for us on this one. Even Detlev calls it a superb copy. I don't have the know-how to capture the photo and post it here, or I would do it. Maybe someone else can for the sake of this thread. There is no maker mark shown on the posting, so I don't know how close this would be.

Would anyone happen to already have one of these, or more photos to share here?

Robert

[Jørgen E]

Here is the DKiG from Detlev's site..

[Robert P.]

Thank you Jorgen,

I'm going to take some shots of my Klein and make a montage to compare...

Robert

[Chet Sowersby]

Intresting, was there a picture of the makers mark and the date included?

Chet

[Jørgen E]

Not as far as I could see I'm afraid :-/

[Robert P.]

Intresting, was there a picture of the makers mark and the date included?

Chet

Neither that I could see, Chet.

Robert

[Darrell]

So who's checked their's after this?

[Robert P.]

I'll get some reverse shots in a few. Here's mine to the right, of course...

Robert

[Harry]

These copies have been around for a while....they are lacking the date and starburst flaws, and the incuse '134' maker stamp is not quite right, but they are very good.

[Robert P.]

.

[Robert P.]

..

[Robert P.]

These copies have been around for a while....they are lacking the date and starburst flaws, and the incuse '134' maker stamp is not quite right, but they are very good.

Harry,

Thank you. I see that now. Got it.

Robert

[Robert P.]

Thank you again Harry,

I guess this shows my experience with the 134's. There are quite a few obvious differences between the two as I study them closer.

Robert

[George Stimson]

"So who's checked their's after this? "

Everybody should have.

[Bill W.]

This is not a new copy. The side by side comparison shows the obvious differences. The maker mark stamp is worse.