unmarkd SB, maker, anyone??

[ben bijker]

Just got in this ek1 screwback, unmarked.
Date looks familiar, but I haven't been able to find it anywhere so far.

(but of course I would like to know )

Thanks in advance,
Ben

[ben bijker]

Date and swas close-up

[ben bijker]

reverse.

No anti-rotation pin, and a bit unusual disc as well.

[AndiK]

Scheisse, Ben. Schicks zurück.

XXX, Ben. Send it back.

[ben bijker]

Are you sure Andreas?
I thought I had seen something similar a while back, same date etc, but couldn't find it....

Ben

[AndiK]

Yes Ben im sure.

You want to see a few "nice" crosses like this?

[Hank C.]

I agree, looks bad to me. The inside corners & beading appear to be VERY uneven.

best
Hank

[ben bijker]

I agree, looks bad to me. The inside corners & beading appear to be VERY uneven.

best
Hank

Hank, that is not unusual.
I have several originals with sloppy beadings, uneven corners and beading.
Should I discard of those crosses in my collection, at least 25 % would have to go....

Regards,
Ben

[AndiK]

Her a few examples of this crosses.

And ben, dont work so hard. You see what happens

[grueni1208]

Scheisse, Ben. Schicks zurück.

XXX, Ben. Send it back.

I agree!

Regards

Grueni

[ben bijker]

Well, that is pretty obvious then

Can't believe I overlooked that, but I will pay more attention in the future....

Thanks guys!

Best regards,
Ben

[Hank C.]

Hank, that is not unusual.
I have several originals with sloppy beadings, uneven corners and beading.
Should I discard of those crosses in my collection, at least 25 % would have to go....

Regards,
Ben

Hi Ben,
You are right about that; but "normally", the core will be an equal distance from certain inner corners of the beading (off to the left, off to the right, etc.). This one is off from top left and lower right; that means the frame itself is uneven. That's the point I was trying to make, it's just sloppy, and not "correct".

best,
Hank

[ben bijker]

[quote=Hank Cummings;2476617]Hi Ben,
You are right about that; but "normally", the core will be an equal distance from certain inner corners of the beading (off to the left, off to the right, etc.). This one is off from top left and lower right; that means the frame itself is uneven. That's the point I was trying to make, it's just sloppy, and not "correct".

best,


Hank[/quoteThanks for the clarification, Hank.
Now it is pretty obvious.

Best regards,
Ben