Originally posted by xerox_
View Post
-
That would be '86' -
paulmann & crone
l had this on the other thread,anyway for easier references next time..here they areComment
-
back
...........Comment
-
is this a really rare cross or something? since 86 ain't on the ek2 list here:
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/iron...roncross_2.htm
Comment
-
The reason why l..or we believe that its a Paulmann & Crone ek2 is because there have been quite a few fine examples of them[all unmarked] with their packets surfacing from good source,they all look the same.And these packets are good hence we know that Paulmann & Crone did made some ek2s whether or not that the parts are mlx and match.The dates on them are unique though...'ugly' l mean..
regarding the ek2 list you have on the link,lts not updated.
regards
simComment
-
Yes, you need to refer to the new updated list of EKII makers, P&C is '86' in bold numbers as stated.Originally posted by sunkist View Post
I have never seen a numbred P&C yet, no - only marked packets and crosses from vets. I'm completely convinced that P&C made period EKII's, absolutely.
RobertComment
-
Here's my example with matching packet. On this one the core is non-magnetic.Last edited by Rich G; 02-27-2008, 11:57 AM.Comment
-
-
-
Here's a Paulmann & Crone set recently added to my collection. The cross is without question from this maker and the packet compares favourably with the examples shown previously. The cross is non magnetic.Last edited by Adrian; 05-04-2009, 01:41 AM.Comment
-
Reverse.....Comment
-
The cross obverse.....Comment
-
Reverse......Comment
-
Swastika and obverse date.....Comment
-
Reverse date.....Comment
Comment