Need help with RK offered for sale

[Richard]

I've been offered the following RK (lazy 2) for purchase at a pretty reasonable price (reasonable being pretty relative here). As I know little about the RK and this will constitute quite an investment, I wanted to see if I could solicit some opinions from some of the more knowledgable members on this site. The pictures are not the best but are the best I could do with what was e-mailed to me. The piece was given to the family after the recipient's death and was, therefore, never worn. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Richard V

[Richard]

some more pics

[Pascal H.]

Hi Richard,

I’m not sure but can you see any crosshatching on this cross.

I think this answers you question.

Pascal

[Dave Kane]

Richard it is a fake!
John

[George Stimson]

The swaz looks too pyramidal (could be the angle, though), I don't like the shapes of the numbers (particularly the "9s"), and it looks like there's a glob of metal between the "1" and "8" of "1813."

[Erich B.]

RK

The frame does not look like that of any Juncker RK I've seen.
Erich

[RoyA]

FAKE!

[Richard]

Many thanks for all the feedback. With this much negative feedback it would be hard to accept this as an original. Thanks for saving me some serious $.
Richard V

[WalterB]

The maker mark is certainly incorrect

[Richard]

Thanks for the many replies. There is some crosshatching but it is inconsistent. So that I might be able to educate myself a little more, what is it about the maker mark that is incorrect and what is it about the frame that is unlike Juncker manufacture?
Richard V

[WalterB]

Richard, I sent you a PM

[Bill Schwarz]

definitely a fake.

bill