Originally posted by Dave Kane
View Post
Leroy, sometimes the 'new blood' brings new ideas!!! Yes, of course that's a method to show finish, working and metal taken away...
As my recent photos show a lack of quality and sharpness (new floors and master bath...equate to total confusion!) because of the disarray at home, I did however, have a look at your proposal...
Sometimes it is in plain sight and we can't, don't or won't see....in this case it's simply obvious!
Yes, there's a tremendous difference in the thickness of the ring base in the Crosses I looked at!
Let's hear from others!
As my recent photos show a lack of quality and sharpness (new floors and master bath...equate to total confusion!) because of the disarray at home, I did however, have a look at your proposal...
Sometimes it is in plain sight and we can't, don't or won't see....in this case it's simply obvious!
Yes, there's a tremendous difference in the thickness of the ring base in the Crosses I looked at!
Let's hear from others!
On my two 57 'non dipping' RKs, (see photos in my earlier post), there is no discernable overlapping of the bottom of the eye and the rim. Then again, assuming that the eyes were originally dipping into the frame, depending on the amount of finishing applied - that is, the amount of eye removed from it's base - it wouldn't necessarily overlap the frame.
I haven't time tonight, but tomorrow I'll measure the thickness of the two eyes and the rims. With the rims I'll take measurements at different points and compare to the rim thickness just under each eye.
Regards
David
Comment