These just arrived today. A couple of maker marked EK2's for opinions etc. The first is marked 93 on the ring. Does this one resemble a wide frame 24 because in my estimation the frame is as wide or wider than my 24 EK2. How often do you see this maker?
-
-
And the rear of the maker marked 93. -
The next one is marked 13 on the ring. This is a more common maker for sure but one I never had in my collection.Comment
-
The rear of the 13 marked cross. I would like to thank member Ben Bijker for giving me a good deal on these EK's in the true spirit of the estand. Thanks for looking. SteveComment
-
I've been trying to even my 39's up with my Imperials lately. Here's my 39 case right now. Still more room but there's 20 there now plus a KVK1.Comment
-
mm13 Looking Good
Hi Steve,
I'm not familiar with the first EKII but your mm13 looks just like my two, both of which have passed the test here. Congratulations. Can't go wrong with Ben Bijker as your source.
Regards,
StuComment
-
He gave me some fair deals, especially considering where EK2 prices have been heading lately.Comment
-
what a coincidence, my last 2 purchases in the last month have been a 13 and a 93 marked EKII also, waiting on the 13 to arrive. Here's my 93 for comparison, sorry about the flash but its midnight here and the best i could do. Nice collection Steve.
glen
EKII mm93 front.JPGComment
-
[ATTACH]753007[/ATTACH]Comment
-
These seem to have a wider frame than usual. I thought only the 24 was like this.Comment
-
EK2 mm #13 & 93
Hi Steve;
Both look good, original IMHO, the mm#93 has very similar dimensions to the mm#24 I have 4 mm#24 and they range width to height 44.78 to 45.08mmin width.The flange width 26.6 mm avg. Howerver thickness of the 3:00 o'clock flange is 4.5mm. the only one I have thats thicker at this moment is the Deschler and I have 4. They range 4.8mm to 5.0mm. Hope this helps .Comment
-
Thanks for the comments guys. That does help. Does anyone want to weigh in on the non magnetic core EK2 I also posted here today?Comment
Comment