Gordon Williamson excludes maker 15 from the list of known EK1 manufacturers in his book 'The Iron Cross of 1939' but 15 is listed by Christopher Ailsby in his 'Collectors Guide to World War 2 German Medals'. Maker 15 is also listed elsewhere in this forum and in the research section, so I hope that means it is an accepted maker. I have two EK1s marked 15 in my collection.
I saw a comment that there is a 'pimple' on the north arm of the frame for this maker. Both my examples exhibit this feature but one has it on the north arm and the other has it on the south arm (they align exactly if one medal is placed beside the other upside down). The two medals have very similar features except the core detail, particularly the swastika, is quite different. As has been speculated elsewhere, does this mean makers used more than one type of core? The pin catches also differ but both types are shown in the research section of the forum.
The 'worn' medal below was obtained reputedly as a war trophy about 35 years ago. The 'minty' one was obtained as one of a batch of EK1s allegedly from captured stocks in Russia. As this maker is not as well known as many others, I thought it would be interesting to compare.
'Worn' example first
I saw a comment that there is a 'pimple' on the north arm of the frame for this maker. Both my examples exhibit this feature but one has it on the north arm and the other has it on the south arm (they align exactly if one medal is placed beside the other upside down). The two medals have very similar features except the core detail, particularly the swastika, is quite different. As has been speculated elsewhere, does this mean makers used more than one type of core? The pin catches also differ but both types are shown in the research section of the forum.
The 'worn' medal below was obtained reputedly as a war trophy about 35 years ago. The 'minty' one was obtained as one of a batch of EK1s allegedly from captured stocks in Russia. As this maker is not as well known as many others, I thought it would be interesting to compare.
'Worn' example first
Comment