I would like any comments or opinions please. Looks good to me, but I could be wrong.......Thanks!
63.3 mm
60.5 grams
5 Domed Head Nickel Rivets
Photo 1:
63.3 mm
60.5 grams
5 Domed Head Nickel Rivets
Photo 1:
-
-
DKiG Photo 2
Photo 2 -
DKiG Photo 3
Photo 3Comment
-
DKiG Photo 4
DKiG photo 4Comment
-
DKiG Photo 5
Photo 5Comment
-
DKiG Photo 6
Photo 6Comment
-
.....I don't know Hauptman,
this cross has a good older looking age and the measurements are very closed to originals but I cannot said is a textbook of Juncker cross because
- metal's reverse side finished is not right as must be
- rivets looks strange ( but maybe is from photolight to light)
- number "2" not the usual used character
- 1941 is not closed as Juncker 1941 ( but both "1" are not good visible, please do a more closed photo)
- enamel looks with round strike as done from machine-reverse too-
- the top tip of the tombak star are not a Juncker type
and other little particulars.
I have doubts but maybe I have wrong mind in this moment and Gordon can say something more then me.
Ivan
Ivan BombardieriComment
-
Round 2
Just my pennies worth...
I am ready to be proved wrong but I'm with Ivan on this, not quite textbook.
It may be a minor and possibly irrelevant detail but to me the central rivet is way off centre which I would not have expected from a Juncker made item. Also the centre rivet seems pointed in shape as opposed to the typical blunt ''button' shape I have seen on Juncker DK's. As Ivan pointed out the 2 is a different shape, the upper curl on the number being much less pronounced than the usual to me.
Just my opinion but I wouldn't buy it no matter how cheap it was.
Spend a fraction of the money on a pair of Nike trainers and run away from this badge.Last edited by martin; 01-21-2003, 07:51 PM.Comment
Comment