CEJ Books

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EK2s for Review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    hello,
    Sorry, the cross of the picture 3 is false
    best regards

    Roland

    Comment


      #17
      No 3 Close ups

      Thanks George

      Are these any good Adrian?

      regards

      Mark
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #18
        Rev date

        ,
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #19
          Hi Mark,
          Thanks for the pics but unfortunately I would say this cross is a fake.
          It looks remarkably like the one in this thread: http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...ad.php?t=46604

          Comment


            #20
            Ok here is my judge.
            Nr 1 and 2 is the same maker, take a look at the small ring for extra marks,
            Nr 3 i dont like any off those shickle b type imo.
            Nr 4 that is a Maybauer if im not that way out.
            Nr 5 Can that be a 13?
            Nr 6 That is a 6!!
            For nr 3
            For the rest
            Mikael

            Comment


              #21
              EK2s

              Hi Meriksson

              Many thanks for your judgement, just the sort of comments that are useful. No 3 is looking bad but the others seem ok

              No 1 has a MM which looks like 7 % and no 2 has a 24 MM, any ideas who MM 7 % might be? I have seen the % MM on Imperial crossess but not on WW2 EK2s.

              I will get the other 6 pictured up today, I have messed with my camera settings and we have daylight here so hopefully the pics will be better.

              best regards

              Mark

              Comment

              Users Viewing this Thread

              Collapse

              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

              Most users ever online was 8,717 at 11:48 PM on 01-11-2024.

              Working...
              X