S&L

[siggihall]

I seldom post hiere but I have 5 S&L, they all look same to me except for, at least to me, tthe swaz in two of them. Not necessary to have 5 I will pick one to keep, but sell rest, unless they differ in any way. Thanks.

[swjXE]

Does #3 have a non magnetic zinc core?

[siggihall]

All unmarked, magnetic.

[boch_62]

It would be nice to see the reverse of these crosses

Regards
Jarek

[Douglas 5]

Does not look like all are S&L EK2s .
I would say:
1- W&H
2- S&L
3- W&H
4- S&L
5- probably S&L

Douglas

[boch_62]

Does not look like all are S&L EK2s .
I would say:
1- W&H
2- S&L
3- W&H
4- S&L
5- probably S&L

Douglas

I'm not so brave

Regards
Jarek

[Douglas 5]

Just going by the right side corner flaws for the W&H .

Understand .... there is a right time to be brave and a wrong time .
Stay save !

Cheers, Douglas
Live a little.jpg

[siggihall]

Thanks, not so good in identifying myself, the makers came from the sellers. I will post pis of the reverse.

[siggihall]

The backside in same order.

[boch_62]

IMO (I stress):
1) W&H (=109)
2) S&L (=4)
3) W&H (=109)
4) Muller (=76)
5) early Wiedmann (=19) with core S&L design and own frame

Regards
Jarek

[siggihall]

Thanks, all opinions appreciated, I will double check and see if someone else gets the same conclusion. The plan was to sell them if W&H, S&L.