Everything in order with this Schinkel EK2?

[wrongplanet67]

The cross should be magnetic. Deumer? Thanks again.

1.jpg


2.jpg

[Vit67]

I think this is fake.

[Dansson]

It's an original Deumer.

[wrongplanet67]

Aha, forum discussion

[Vit67]

Aha, forum discussion

Isn't it a purpose of it. Exchange of opinions.

[wrongplanet67]

Isn't it a purpose of it. Exchange of opinions.

Yes, ofcourse. No problem. It was an ironic remark because of the different opinions. I thank you for your input.
That's one of the reasons why I use the forum and ask opinions: to avoid purchases of fakes.

[Dennis J]

I think this is fake.

What makes you think it is a fake it looks fine to me jmo.

Dennis J

[Vit67]

After going through reference literature. I have to admit it is indeed Deumer Schinkel variante.

[Vit67]

What makes you think it is a fake it looks fine to me jmo.

Dennis J

I was put away by weird inner corners of the frame.

[Vit67]

What I really like in this process, after such vigorous review all specific details of some particular cross will be imprinted in your mind ( for future reference)

[sanya13]

from this manufacturer there is a piece with a magnetic and non-magnetic inner core too of course .

[wrongplanet67]

from this manufacturer there is a piece with a magnetic and non-magnetic inner core too of course .

Indeed.

Are the magnetic ones more or less common than the non magnetic ones?

[sanya13]

Indeed.

Are the magnetic ones more or less common than the non magnetic ones?

yes , the non-magnetic type rarer,here are my two different inner core types

[wrongplanet67]

yes , the non-magnetic type rarer,here are my two different inner core types

Alright, noted.

[boch_62]

It's an original Deumer.

+1

Regards
Jarek