If this was a baseball game, it would have not even started yet, as the opposing team has not thrown a single pitch, whether it a strike or a ball !Yet no one will address the facts, because they are hard to face
1. A plated rounder with 800 stamping, which is a PK violation
2. Another rounder with evidence of plating by visual inspection on SEM
3. No one willing to spend $20 and an hour to see if their piece is plated
4. No period third reich piece with similar paint on the core
5. A markedly different visual appearance of the paint under high mag
6. No photos of rounders in wear
7. No pieces with provenance
8. Lower quality construction of beading as compared to other period makers.
Now there is the "con" view. Where is the evidence for the "pro" view, beyond people really hoping and wishing that they are real? Where is there any evidence? This is like a trial, where it is a weight of evidence issue. No one was there in world war two to know one way or another, but we have to make inferences based on available forensic evidence. Check the pieces out. If you fear the truth, just sit idly back and complain. If you really feel these are wartime, prove it. The truth is easily reachable for those so inclined. But if the truth is not favorable, will they reveal the information or, or conceal it? So far, I have seen no facts to confirm or support the rounder being wartime. Plenty of conjecture, but no facts. What facts are there to support this contention? Please list them.
The simple fact that no one is even willing to check to see if thier piece is plated, which I suspect all of them are, speaks volumes. The owners do not really want to know. Why debate about whether Gordon Williamson is the voice of God and is infallable, when one can easily and simply find out for sure? George, do you honestly think that the Iron Cross of 1939 is the truth of God as told by Gordon? Come on. Let's think for ourselves and critically evaluate the information. To simply state that it is the truth because it appears in that book is quite silly.
1. A plated rounder with 800 stamping, which is a PK violation
2. Another rounder with evidence of plating by visual inspection on SEM
3. No one willing to spend $20 and an hour to see if their piece is plated
4. No period third reich piece with similar paint on the core
5. A markedly different visual appearance of the paint under high mag
6. No photos of rounders in wear
7. No pieces with provenance
8. Lower quality construction of beading as compared to other period makers.
Now there is the "con" view. Where is the evidence for the "pro" view, beyond people really hoping and wishing that they are real? Where is there any evidence? This is like a trial, where it is a weight of evidence issue. No one was there in world war two to know one way or another, but we have to make inferences based on available forensic evidence. Check the pieces out. If you fear the truth, just sit idly back and complain. If you really feel these are wartime, prove it. The truth is easily reachable for those so inclined. But if the truth is not favorable, will they reveal the information or, or conceal it? So far, I have seen no facts to confirm or support the rounder being wartime. Plenty of conjecture, but no facts. What facts are there to support this contention? Please list them.
The simple fact that no one is even willing to check to see if thier piece is plated, which I suspect all of them are, speaks volumes. The owners do not really want to know. Why debate about whether Gordon Williamson is the voice of God and is infallable, when one can easily and simply find out for sure? George, do you honestly think that the Iron Cross of 1939 is the truth of God as told by Gordon? Come on. Let's think for ourselves and critically evaluate the information. To simply state that it is the truth because it appears in that book is quite silly.
Comment