Hello,
Picked this up a while back and just getting around to posting it. I got Dietrich and Mario's EK2 book last week and thought I'd use this cross as my first to try to find the maker. Well, many hours later after going through every example I failed miserably. Not sure if this one is not in the book, but more likely I just failed to correctly identify it.
So, can y'all give me an opinion as to originality of the set and maker of the cross? Also, is it correct for this cross to be with this case or should it be an L marked cross? I ask because I have no provenance for this set and I have a couple of L marked EKs that would go with it really well.
Thank you,
Dale
Picked this up a while back and just getting around to posting it. I got Dietrich and Mario's EK2 book last week and thought I'd use this cross as my first to try to find the maker. Well, many hours later after going through every example I failed miserably. Not sure if this one is not in the book, but more likely I just failed to correctly identify it.
So, can y'all give me an opinion as to originality of the set and maker of the cross? Also, is it correct for this cross to be with this case or should it be an L marked cross? I ask because I have no provenance for this set and I have a couple of L marked EKs that would go with it really well.
Thank you,
Dale
Comment