DKIG Zimmerman

[rhys1]

I appreciate that these aren’t the best pics, but I can’t see any red flags, your opinions would be most appreciated.

[Mike Kenny]

Hi,

No red flags apparent to me from the pics provided. It appears to be a nice worn original from what I can see.

Regards
Mike

[ccfc]

Looks okay to me too

Can’t quite see the 10/11 o’clock blob from the pictures though

Regards

Lee

[George Stimson]

Is it the dotted date version?

[rhys1]

Is it the dotted date version?

Hi George,

I’ve asked the seller for some more detailed pics of the date. I’ve checked Dietrichs book which I picked up recently but can’t make a determination without better pics.

[Ralph Arndt]

Nice

[AndyC]

Ask for better pictures of the 1941 date



Andy

[rhys1]

Ask for better pictures of the 1941 date



Andy

Yeah I have - really hoping to pick one of these up, but it’ll have to be on a layaway plan

[Gary Symonds]

Original, light 20.

[rhys1]

Just waiting for more of the date ... still inconclusive

[PanzerElite]

1000% original, and not dotted version.

[rhys1]

Evening guys,

The vendor has just got back to me with a pic of the date :-



This doesn’t look quite right and looks like a double strike ?

What are your thoughts ?

[George Stimson]

It sure does look double-struck.

[rhys1]

It sure does look double-struck.

Given the prestigious nature of this award I would’ve thought that quality control would’ve been better ? I appreciate that these light awards are later, but all the same I’m a bit surprised. Think I’ll pass on this and wait for another

[George Stimson]

The double striking makes it an interesting variation, though.