Questionable "Robert Hauschild"-EK II-packet

[peterm]

Thomas H told me as follows:

Hi Peter,

Missed this thread before. I think your packet is fake as well.

It has the same font/designation as found on the (in)famous fake EKII packet that is around for years, they just added the maker's mark, which I can't recall seeing before like this, and made it a righthand folded packet.

Now that it is on the estand you could maybe post the packet also in the "cases and packets forum" and ask for more opinions.

Regards, Thomas

Hi guys!

I'm posting the "Hauschild" packet here for Your review.

Many thanks and best regards,

Peter

[Thomas H]

Attached photos show the classic fake.

Peter packet has a MM and is righthand folded compered to the one below

[Thomas H]

.

[peterm]

Hi guys!

Please let us know Your opinions in this case. At the moment I only have Thomas H's statement of my packet being a copy , but his example doesn't have much in common with mine as far as I can see...
On the other hand I don't want to sell something questionable, so I need Your help here.

Thanks in advance, best regards, Peter

[Allan P.]

Let's take a moment to have a good hard look at the two designations and decide are they the same?

Allan

[martin3]

Little more convincing due to the blue paper, mark and the better cut, but still the same fake designation as my first fake set bought at Chiney.
Came with a *** or 333 marked cross, which unfortunately I don't own anymore.

I consider these now as interesting reference material.
Like every now and than I watch at a fake Floch to keep in mind how it looks like.

Best regards,
Martin