Can the people in the know who study these shields let me know what is good and what is bad. It has been a long time since I picked these up and I am not up on what is what with these. Any help would be appreciated.
-
-
3 Shields for review
After going through old posts I am leaning towards bad on the Kuban and Narvik and the Demjansk seems to me to be OK. Am I on track
-
3 Shields for review
DemjanskComment
-
Narvik and Kuban are fakes, Demjansk good.
My books:
- THE WEHRPAß & SOLDBUCH OF THE WH
- THE SS TK RING
- THE ITALIAN-GERMAN MEDAL
- THE ANTI PARTISAN BADGE
- THE AWARDS OF THE LW
and more!
sigpicComment
-
Agreed.Comment
-
Shields
So I was correct. Thanks for the confirmation. I have had them all for quite sometime I can't even remember where I got them. Is there a name associated with these two fakes and is the Demjansk a known maker? Again i appreciate the help.Comment
-
The name associated with the reproductions is precisely that. As for the Demjansk you will need to see if s maker mark is on the back of the shield body.Comment
-
3 shields
I was talking about how some collectors name fakes like the low 4 narvik and so on but it really doesn't matter thanks for the info.
KevinComment
Comment