Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_b12faa3ae14c6492b4b5b9a7c824876b71317f3e75ed2fa0, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Narvik shields - only two variants? - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
BrunoMado

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Narvik shields - only two variants?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Narvik shields - only two variants?

    Greetings sirs,
    I want to ask you to express your opinion concerning the text resulted by me.
    The matter is that in <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:country-region><ST1Russia</ST1</st1:country-region> there is an author of books under awards of the Third Reich.
    Today at Russian forum it has written, that in his opinion was only two variants Narvik shield and Demjansk shield as.
    I as well as other collectors now we do not know what to do with shields which are not in his opinion originals. Can be them throw out?
    I am sorry if, something will be not understandable. It was difficult for me to translate on English.
    KR,<O</O
    Roman

    #2
    "How many enough simple products how shield, the enterprise, let small, two press having in stock even can issue? Under condition of work of 50 minutes at <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:time Hour="1" Minute="0"><st1:time Hour="1" Minute="0">one o'clock</st1:time></st1:time> during 8 hours (I think duration of the working day at that time could be and more), 6 days in a week are precisely, the worker can process on press of 5-6 preparations in one minute. Let will be 5. Total for working week can be stamped about 13000 shilds. Means for such small enterprise 35-40000 shields in a month - not a limit. Soldering of fastenings, finishing furnish (it is quite possible only pair loadings of a galvanic bath), assembly - are unequivocally conducted in parallel (differently simply illiterate organization of manufacture). I do not think, that it is meaningful to scatter the order which circulation no more than 50000 products on several manufacturers, complicating calculations for finished goods, quality assurance, etc., etc. Proofs to this - weight from a history of awards, such as the Cross for military merits (made nearly year) and East medal instead of which long time was handed over only with tapes, and the same Narvik shield. The first order on 10000 shields in silver (quantity specified Ditl, I think with a decent stock) it has been made operatively enough (the end of 1940 year, for firm quantity - not big), but has got stuck in ice. The second release was made, most likely, after occurrence of need(requirement) to award the naval personnel with a board, excellent on color. At the same time have finished missing quantity shields in silver... Let to everyone as like to specify many sources but that I have not found in primary sources, handed over on 4 shields (interestingly as passed process - lump sum delivery or the further purchase of the present awards protected by the Law on awards in the private order). Total a maximum quantity, capable to satisfy all reasonable searches - approximately 36-40000 shields. practically monthly loading of the "small" enterprise... If Westerners speak, that shields firm Deumer- made that the enterprise completely not microscopic... I would believe anybody did not begin to doin firm stamps (the most labors - consuming and expensive enough operation in all production) more than one, it is not meaningful - even industrial parties of hardware at the modern enterprises are without effort fulfilled by one complete set of equipment! I think - logic acknowledgement of it is a Narvik shield! The first stamp - from expensive metal with qualitative silvering - fulfilled order Ditl. The second - from cheaper zinc with silvering and gilding, rewardings with which have ended on <st1:date Month="1" Day="31" Year="1942"><st1:date Month="1" Day="31" Year="1942">January, 31, 1942</st1:date></st1:date>. And in the subsequent, I believe, the quantity of "consumers" of a board only decreased, in consequence of the reasons known for all. I think - stamps was only 2, let somebody will convince me of the opposite, for example in 100-thousand stocks of Narvik... The Penny the price then to praised German economists - if you him will tell such - they will stone you. I am guided by the same reasons and concerning board Demjansk - two stamps (the first " without a penultimate log " in the right PILLBOX, the second better) and variations only in materials of a board and a return plate... In general only economic sense of division of the order on several manufacturers - the increase in the cost price of production is practically multiple to number of executors of the order (cost of manufacturing of industrial equipment will be included in cost of each part of the order - and it is big enough share of cost of the order). Who is confident, what budgetary financing of manufacturing of awards planned sillyfrom economy??"

    Comment

    Users Viewing this Thread

    Collapse

    There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.

    Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

    Working...
    X