no scabbard. thank you
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WWII Naval sword for review
Collapse
X
-
Sword
Well its more like a civilian mounted sword with naval characteristics than a textbook navy. Color of wrap and backing along with tsuba are similar to some navys. Both fuchi and kashira are not normal. If you take the blade out of the hilt that may help as the majority of navy blades were stainless steel with an anchor stamp on tang.
-
i found what seems like a similar sword but at a much higher price. i'm assuming it's the 1500 dated blade that makes the difference. can i rule out that the blade on my sword does not date back to 1500 and why? i know i'll need to pull out the tang to see any markings but is there anything else that tells you that this is not such an old blade? i'm learning here... thank you
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=631498
Comment
-
Always good to learn and it's something we all do at any stage of this hobby.
Price difference is accounted for (IMHO) due to the lack of several parts, as listed by member gunto, on the example shown on this thread. If you were to buy them now to refurbish the sword they would cost several hundred dollars if not more.
As for the blade, to be sure we need to see the nakago but it does not appear to me to be an ancestral blade remounted for war.
Regards,
Stu
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jareth View PostGunto love your swords! Why cant I find one good one! My favorites are the leather saya covers. Is the rayskin underneath?
I just love the sunray seppas on this sword. IMO this sword type w/ cover indicates SNLF.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment