Ok so last week i picked up a sword from a chinese man. He told me it dated back at least 65-80 years. He stressed that it is CHINESE made and not japanese. So i picked it up because it did look cool and was cheep.
So i get home and do some research because the markings are stange to me and it matchs the making in this picture on this web site.
http://personal.cheness.com/WorldWarIISword.htm
So can any one tell me if this story is true? If so, than why would have a sword that a POW was forced to made not as good and the Japanese?
So i get home and do some research because the markings are stange to me and it matchs the making in this picture on this web site.
http://personal.cheness.com/WorldWarIISword.htm
So can any one tell me if this story is true? If so, than why would have a sword that a POW was forced to made not as good and the Japanese?
Comment