The professor was in a bit of a hurry. Or at least he seemed to be. I got the impression that he didn't like looking at the helmet. Maybe it was embarassing to him.
Sort of like showing an SS helmet to an older German man. Not the done thing.
So he just told me briefly what he thought it said and that was that. No chit-chat. No small talk. And certainly no criticism of the poor handwriting!
Alright -- last question. Do you think the liner and straps are original? I have my doubts, but it's just a gut feel. I've never seen ink-stamps like the one on the liner, and so as I said above, I suspect it is a reproduction liner that was used by a reenactor or movie extra.
Kenny, are there the typical showa/date stamp on the reverse of any of the other pads? Can you provide close up photo of chinstrap? The weave/pattern looks off.
Since the "26 reproduction" stamping is on the underside of the front liner pad where the liner manufacturer's stamping and Showa date would typically be, and since the chin straps do not appear to be of the typical 16-ribbed woven cotton type, it is my opinion that the liner and chin straps are reproductions.
Thanks for the photos, Eric. It's easy to see the difference between the reproduction on my helmet and the originals you have.
Let's close this thread down. I think all the evidence has added up to one conclusion -- my helmet is a restored shell with a reproduction liner and chinstraps.
Comment