Originally posted by PlaceOfBayonets
View Post
Well even I can see that this is a post-war repaint with either the totally wrong texture or painted over a previously rusted/ sand blasted helmet.
but note what I have previously stated about the careful painting of the segments and the attempt at copy of an existing camo. Typical of repaint for sure.
also note that it has no paint-runs what so ever. The paint has been carefully spread out and had time to settle thus drying even without brush marks.
Keep in mind that what they put in paint in the period of 1900 to 1930 such as lead was designed to make it dry faster plus pigment it but this could mean more brush marks & runs. Of course the Germans used the technique of bush marks on a WW1 helmet to matt it esp. in the 1917 period plus the type of brushes they used caused them as well.
Since the 1950's/ 60's they have developed new additives and paints which dry in a way to even out brush marks or let you paint a run back in to even it out. The German were finding out such things in the 30's & 40's. In fact it was often their discoveries which were taken and used by the victor nations after 1945.
Another thing, the German never had too much lead to spare for paint in the period 1916-18 so they had to come up with other drying elements & pigments which might in some cases dry even faster depending on what they were using. Lead was actually banned by them for household paint in 1926 because they were ahead in the development of other petro- chemicals which they could put in paint probably because of the necessity of their ersatz experiences in WW1 to camo helmets, vehicles, weapons, boats etc . (also ahead in "green enviroment" thinking by todays standards doing that so early on)
Personally this one is nothing like "Mayer's first helmet but I like the other original camos you have just shown images of,
Chris
Comment