GeneralAssaultMilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sb and MP of Husaren Regiment Koenig Albert 18

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Not quite sure why a Husar would be listed as an Ulan on the cover of that Soldbuch.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by pauke View Post
      I see no entries to indicate his being in the infantry. His time with the munitions column of a foot arty. batl. would indicate to me that he was probably handling horses to transport ammunition. This seems a likely job for a dismounted cavalryman.
      Cavalry was used in an infantry capacity and lost their horses pretty quickly to the artillery - they kept their regimental status as cavalry but were used as infantry.

      Comment


        #18
        Ok thanks. I was curious to know if he fought or was behind lines. But at Amiens every man fought as i can read...

        Comment


          #19
          Someone has to bring up the fireworks to pound the Stellungskaempfe and this job could get you killed or gassed as well as infantry. Artillery batteries were obvious targets and his life was certainly in jeopardy.

          Comment


            #20
            As Tom points out 54 cavalry regiments were dismounted to serve as infantry during the war. Of these 30 were raised before the war and were called Unberittene-Kavallerie (Dismounted Cavalry). Another 24 regiments were raised after beginning of hostilities. These were called Kavallerie-Schutzen (Mounted Rifles). The Unberitten-Kavallerie retained their unit identification including shoulder insignia. Kavallerie-Schutzen enlisted personnel wore green straps with red numbers.

            Mike

            Comment


              #21
              look at the coupons at end of Soldbuch, his rank is as a grenadier

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by soldbuch View Post
                look at the coupons at end of Soldbuch, his rank is as a grenadier
                All rather peculiar: so he is a husar, an ulan and a grenadier?

                Comment


                  #23
                  whatever

                  In spite of the history of cav. regts. etc. I am only making reference to what is written or stamped into the two books. Anyone other than Naxos and I need to read and tell us all where any other specific reference is made to this soldier's unit(s) besides what Naxos first stated. Plenty of reference to typhus shots and some leave time but no infantry reference.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by soldbuch View Post
                    look at the coupons at end of Soldbuch, his rank is as a grenadier
                    That is not "Gren." for Grenadier but "Gem.", the abbreviation for Gemeiner or Gemeinen - meaning common soldier

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by pauke View Post
                      In spite of the history of cav. regts. etc. I am only making reference to what is written or stamped into the two books. Anyone other than Naxos and I need to read and tell us all where any other specific reference is made to this soldier's unit(s) besides what Naxos first stated. Plenty of reference to typhus shots and some leave time but no infantry reference.
                      Please understand that the original question was if this soldier actually fought in his designed cavalry role or was used in an infantry capacity. The later was done with most cavalry units as there was no use in modern warfare for horse soldiers but there was for foot soldiers. So this cavalry man stayed in the cavalry but fought as an infantry soldier even though he never joined an infantry regiment.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by kaiserwilhelm2 View Post
                        there was no use in modern warfare for horse soldiers
                        I would agree that there was "little" use, but not "no" use for mounted soldiers in WWI. There were many mounted Feld-Gendarmerie units, and some cavalry units continued to serve their traditional functions on the East front.

                        Chip

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Chip M View Post
                          I would agree that there was "little" use, but not "no" use for mounted soldiers in WWI. There were many mounted Feld-Gendarmerie units, and some cavalry units continued to serve their traditional functions on the East front.

                          Chip
                          Yes little is more accurate than no.

                          Comment

                          Users Viewing this Thread

                          Collapse

                          There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                          Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                          Working...
                          X