Back to this discussion, I would like to remark that I'm aware that the Fraktur font (in its variations and styles was in use well earlier than 1914.
calling it "modern", was in connection to the style of engraving: not what to be expected on an EK-I 1914 (award type or private purchase type, the latter, until the early '20s).
The naming appears as engraved with a pantograph or, regarding this font, with a relatively old "Gravo-Graph" machine or a similar one (the machines of that type now on the market, are equipped with a laser, instead of a diamond point). Not an engraving that would correctly appear on an original piece.
Would this ek's engraving be original, it should have been done by hand.
E.L.
calling it "modern", was in connection to the style of engraving: not what to be expected on an EK-I 1914 (award type or private purchase type, the latter, until the early '20s).
The naming appears as engraved with a pantograph or, regarding this font, with a relatively old "Gravo-Graph" machine or a similar one (the machines of that type now on the market, are equipped with a laser, instead of a diamond point). Not an engraving that would correctly appear on an original piece.
Would this ek's engraving be original, it should have been done by hand.
E.L.
Comment